Ο Saddam Hussein

Και το αίσχος των εκτελέσεων.

Με μία εκτέλεση ντροπής  σήμερα τα ξημερώματα, ο Saddam Hussein  πέρασε  στο παρελθόν σαν ένα από τα "Σκουπίδια της ιστορίας".

Αδύναμη μνήμη έχουν οι ΗΠΑ. Όταν συνεργάζονταν στενά με τον πρώην δικτάτορα κάθε άλλο παρά "σκουπίδι" τον θεωρούσαν.

Ο αμερικανικός και ευρωπαϊκός τύπος είναι μουδιασμένος και διχασμένος.

Το ίδιο και η κοινή γνώμη των ΗΠΑ.

Οι πολιτείες που έχουν καταργήσει την θανατική ποινή, κατ' εξοχήν στο Βορρά,

αντιδρούν στις εκτελέσεις, ενώ αντίθετα ο ρατσιστικός νότος επικροτεί.

Οι ευρωπαίοι δημοσιογράφοι δεν τολμούν ανοιχτά να εκφράσουν την αντίθεσή τους εν όψει των νέων πολιτικών παιχνιδιών καιι των ανακατατάξεων που επίκεινται.

Τα βαλκάνια, κατ' εξοχήν υποστηρικτές του Saddam, εν όψει των νέων οριοθετήσεων  στην ευαίσθητη αυτή περιοχή δέχονται το νέο χλιαρά.

Οι εξελίξεις στην ιστορία καλπάζουν.

Όπως είχε πει και η πρόεδρος της ελληνικής βουλής πριν δύο χρόνια ακριβώς:

Πολλά θα αλλάξουν στην γειτονιά μας. Νέα εποχή,  νέες οριοθετήσεις. θα χρειαστεί να κάνουμε υποχωρήσεις που θα μας επιτρέψουν να προχωρήσουμε.

Δεν είναι τα ακριβή λόγια της, αλλά σηματοδοτούν τη νέα Εποχή των υποχωρήσεων έναντι στις εντολές των ΗΠΑ.

Κωνσταντίνος Αλ.

The New York Times

CHINA TO STEP UP PRESSURE TO NORTH KOREA

Empty Chinese trucks waited Thursday to enter North Korea, while North Korean trucks filled with iron ore made their way into northern China.

Published: October 20, 2006

BEIJING, Oct. 19 China is prepared to step up pressure on North Korea in coming weeks by reducing oil shipments, among other measures, if the country refuses to return to negotiations or conducts more nuclear tests, Chinese government advisers and scholars who have discussed the matter with the leadership say.

If Beijing does take a tougher line on its neighbor and longtime ally, the action is likely to bolster its relationship with the United States. Washington has urged Chinese leaders to use all the tools at their disposal to put additional pressure on Kim Jong-il, the North Korean leader.

Among the most potent of those tools is oil. China provides an estimated 80 to 90 percent of North Korea's oil imports, shipped by pipeline at undisclosed prices that Chinese officials say represent a steep discount from the world market price. Any reduction in that aid could severely hamper North Korea's already faltering economy.

Several leading Chinese experts said senior officials had indicated in the past week that they planned to slap new penalties on North Korea going beyond the ban on sales of military equipment imposed by the United Nations. But they would be likely to hold off if Mr. Kim agreed to return soon to multilateral talks North Korea has boycotted since September 2005. Years of talks have produced meager results.

Discussions about how to respond to the nuclear test, which was described by one expert as a "political earthquake" for Chinese leaders, come amid a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ironing out enforcement of United Nations sanctions and luring Mr. Kim back to negotiations.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is to arrive here Friday to meet with Chinese officials. On Thursday in Pyongyang, Mr. Kim met a delegation sent by President Hu Jintao of China, the first diplomatic contact with the North Korean leader since the nuclear test on Oct. 9.

There was no immediate word on what Mr. Kim told the Chinese, but Beijing experts said he would most likely have declined to meet with the delegation, headed by a cabinet-level official, State Councilor Tang Jiaxuan, unless he hoped to head off additional penalties by promising to resume negotiations.

"China is going to have to make some crucial choices in the coming days," said one senior international relations specialist who has participated in top-level discussions of the matter but asked to remain anonymous. "I think Chinese leaders are prepared to take a hard line, but Kim may be smart enough to try to divide China and the U.S."

China and the United States already have some differences over how to enforce the United Nations sanctions that they and the rest of the Security Council voted for last Saturday. Beijing says it will not interdict North Korean cargo ships at sea, as the United States and Japan have recommended, and has warned against seeking to use the sanctions to provoke a confrontation.

"All sides need to consider how to implement Resolution 1718 in a balanced way and not devise ways to willfully expand the sanctions," Liu Jianchao, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, said Thursday, referring to the Security Council resolution banning the sale or transfer of missile- or nuclear-weapons-related goods to North Korea. "Sanctions are the signal, not the goal."

But Chinese experts who have taken part in discussions about how to manage the situation said that after North Korea's missile tests in July, Chinese leaders concluded that Mr. Kim might not negotiate a way out of the impasse unless he had no other choice. Officials felt badly stung by the nuclear test and have dug in their heels on ending the nuclear program there, the experts said.

China has opposed military action or an embargo to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons to its Korean War ally and has subsidized Mr. Kim's its government despite gross human rights violations. But it is also wary that Mr. Kim may set off an arms race in Northeast Asia and prompt Japan and South Korea, and even Taiwan, to seek nuclear weapons.

Beijing's relations with North Korea have been strained for many years, and some Chinese officials argue that Mr. Kim wants a nuclear trump card to intimidate China as much as the United States.

In the wake of the test, President Hu renewed his government's commitment to "a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula," and ruled out recognizing North Korea, as a fellow nuclear power, they said.

"I believe that Chinese leaders are firmly resolved to roll back the nuclear program and not accept it as an accomplished fact," said Zhang Liangui, a Korea expert at the Communist Party's Central Party School in Beijing who has favored taking a tougher line.

"I do not think that the resolve of the Chinese leadership is going to be less than the resolve of the American leadership," he said.

Others agreed, arguing that as long as the Bush administration kept its focus on a diplomatic solution, China would work to maintain solidarity with the United States.

"The only issue that they do not agree on is interdiction at sea," said Xu Guangyu, a retired general who is now a member of the Chinese Arms Control and Disarmament Association, a government-sponsored institute. "For the most part the United States has responded to this with the right tone, so I don't see a major obstacle to cooperation."

Bush Faces A battery of ugly Choices On War

THE NEW YORK TIMES

News Analysis

Bush Faces a Battery of Ugly Choices on War


 
Published: October 20, 2006

WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 The acknowledgment by the United States Army spokesman in Iraq that the latest plan to secure Baghdad has faltered leaves President Bush with some of the ugliest choices he has yet faced in the war.

He can once again order a rearrangement of American forces inside the country, as he did in August, when American commanders declared that newly trained Iraqi forces would "clear and hold" neighborhoods with backup support from redeployed American forces. That strategy collapsed within a month, frequently forcing the Americans to take the lead, making them prime targets.

There is no assurance, though, that another redeployment of those forces will reduce the casualty rate, which has been unusually high in recent weeks, senior military and administration officials say. The toll comes just before midterm elections, in which even many of his own party have given up arguing that progress is being made or that the killing will soon slow.

Or Mr. Bush can reassess the strategy itself, perhaps listening to those advisers including some members of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, the advisory commission charged with coming up with new strategies for Iraq who say that he needs to redefine the "victory" that he again on Thursday declared was his goal.

One official providing advice to the president noted on Thursday that while Mr. Bush still insists his goal is an Iraq that "can govern itself, sustain itself and defend itself," he has already dropped most references to creating a flourishing democracy in the heart of the Middle East.

Or, he could take the advice of Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who is expected to run to replace him in two years, who argues in favor of pouring more troops into Iraq, an option one senior administration official said recently might make sense but could "cause the bottom to fall out" of public support.

But whatever choices he makes probably not until after the Nov. 7 election, and perhaps not until the bipartisan group issues its report they will be forced by a series of events, in Iraq and at home, that now seems largely out of Mr. Bush's control, in Iraq and at home.

Every day, administration and Pentagon officials fume privately, to avoid the ire of the White House about frustrations with Iraq's prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, for not confronting the country's Shiite militias, meaning that there is no end to the daily cycle of attack and reprisals. Mr. Bush finds himself increasingly unable to make a convincing argument that, behind the daily toll in American lives, the Maliki government is making measurable progress, or even that the problems in Iraq are subject to a military solution.

It is a vexing quandary that military experts say they doubt that any study group even the blue-ribbon group assembled under former Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Representative Lee H. Hamilton of Indiana can cut its way through.

At the Pentagon, several examinations of the current approach in Iraq are under way, including an effort ordered by Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He has asked the Army and the other services to identify officers who have recently returned from Iraq and to ask them to offer their views to the joint staff about whether adjustments in tactics or strategy are necessary, two military officials said.

"We are not able to project sufficient coalition and Iraqi forces to properly execute the strategy" of clearing, holding and rebuilding Baghdad and other areas of insurgents and hostile militias, said another veteran, retired Gen. Jack Keane, a former Army vice chief of staff. "General Pace is doing the right thing by reassessing our entire strategy."

Mr. Bush says his resolve to win is unshaken. But a few of his aides were wondering aloud why Mr. Bush, asked to respond to a column by Thomas L. Friedman in The New York Times that compared the Ramadan attacks in Iraq to the 1968 Tet offensive, said the comparison "could be right."

"There's certainly a stepped up level of violence, and we're heading into an election," he told George Stephanopoulos of ABC News on Wednesday. "George, my gut tells me that they have all along been trying to inflict enough damage that we would leave."

For now there is no talk of leaving. But there is plenty of talk about pulling back.

"The Iraq situation is not winnable in any real sense of the word 'winnable,' " Richard N. Haass, the former chief of the policy planning operations in the State Department during Mr. Bush's first term, told reporters on Thursday. Privately, Pentagon strategists and some administration officials note that President Bush has talked often in recent months of changing his tactics, but not his strategy.

"Tactics are something you can turn on a dime," said Richard L. Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state, and an Army veteran with close ties to the military. "Strategy takes time, and that's the question. Do we have time for a new strategy?"

While members of the Iraq Strategy Group are cagey about the recommendations they are drafting, several say that Mr. Baker who is in regular contact with Mr. Bush is seeking to move away from Mr. Bush's strategy of withdrawing Americans when the Iraqis are ready to replace them and toward one that sets a schedule.

"Jim's problem is that he wants a way to make clear to Maliki that we're leaving, but without signaling to the Shia and the Sunni that if they bide their time, they can battle it out for Iraq," said one longtime national security expert who recently testified in front of the study group. "How do you do that? Got me."

Then there is the recurring question whether a new strategy requires the exit of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

Privately some Republicans say that the combination of a poor showing in next month's midterm elections and the worsening violence could ultimately force Mr. Rumsfeld's departure. Pentagon aides say Mr. Rumsfeld is not planning on going anywhere. "He serves at the pleasure of the president and has no intention to step down," said Eric Ruff, the Pentagon press secretary. And, officially, the White House says it has no intention of changing its strategy, either. Only its tactics.

Doubts Rise on Iraqi Premier’s Strength

Doubts Rise on Iraqi Premier's Strength Max Becherer/Polaris, for The New York Times By EDWARD WONG Published: September 20, 2006 BAGHDAD, Sept. 19 Senior Iraqi and American officials are beginning to question whether Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki has the political muscle and decisiveness to hold Iraq together as it hovers on the edge of a full civil war. Skip to next paragraph The Reach of War Go to Complete Coverage » Four months into his tenure, Mr. Maliki has failed to take aggressive steps to end the country's sectarian strife because they would alienate fundamentalist Shiite leaders inside his fractious government who have large followings and private armies, senior Iraqi politicians and Western officials say. He is also constrained by the need to woo militant Sunni Arabs connected to the insurgency. Patience among Iraqis is wearing thin. Many complain that they have seen no improvement in security, the economy or basic services like electricity. Some Sunni Arab neighborhoods seem particularly deprived, fueling distrust of the Shiite-led government. Concerns about the toughness of the new government seemed reflected in President Bush's comments when he met Tuesday with Iraq's president, Jalal Talabani. Mr. Bush said he wanted Iraqis to know "that the United States of America stands with them, so long as the government continues to make the tough choices necessary for peace to prevail." Mr. Maliki, a conservative Shiite, took office in May. A senior American diplomat here said the White House still had confidence in him, mainly because "he has articulated goals for Iraq that make sense to us." Bush administration officials have repeatedly cautioned that Mr. Maliki needs more time. "This is a national unity government of many, many moving parts," said the diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "He has got to negotiate as he goes." But diplomats who deal with the Bush administration on Iraq issues, and recently departed officials who stay in contact with their colleagues in the government, say the president's top advisers have a far more pessimistic view. "The thing you hear the most is that he never makes any decisions," said a former senior official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss internal deliberations. "And that drives Bush crazy. He doesn't take well to anyone who talks about getting something accomplished and then refuses to take the first step." American officials here say they do not intend to let Mr. Maliki fail and are helping him in a variety of ways. For example, to bolster Iraqis' confidence, American generals are spending money on quick reconstruction projects like trash pickup as the military goes through troubled neighborhoods of Baghdad. The embassy has advisers who work closely with cabinet ministers and has deployed hundreds of Americans to seven provinces to help Iraqi officials build up the government's political and economic strength. A senior envoy said the biggest effort was simply "Diplomacy 101" insisting to Iraqi leaders that they resolve their differences. But increasingly, Iraqi and Western officials say the unity government is one in name only, with the political parties representing different sects and ethnicities constantly at odds, undermining Mr. Maliki's ability to build consensus. While the United States has military might and political influence, it must rely on the Iraqi government to reach out to the country's political and religious leaders. Trying to placate everyone has kept Mr. Maliki from being able to offer amnesty to Sunni insurgents or forcefully disarm Shiite militias, officials say. The main Shiite bloc itself is deeply divided, depriving the prime minister of crucial support. So he relies on Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric who commands the powerful militia called the Mahdi Army, for political backing. The militia has been blamed by many Sunni Arabs for sectarian killings. To ensure that the minority Sunni Arabs remain involved in the government, Mr. Maliki finds himself compromising on issues like cabinet appointments with conservative Sunni parties that have occasional contact with nationalist guerrillas. "I think he has said good things, but in practice there has been no change," said Mahmoud Othman, an independent Kurdish legislator. "The security situation is deteriorating and violence is getting worse. He has done nothing against militias. At the same time, the reconciliation dialogue is not moving forward. It doesn't look good, the prospects for the government. "I thought he'd be stronger, but he looks weak," Mr. Othman said. "He feels frustrated because nobody's cooperating with him." The same sentiments are heard in the streets of the capital. "There's no security, no job opportunities, no services, nothing at all," said Muhammad Jabar Abdul Ridha, 18, a construction worker walking through downtown Baghdad on Tuesday afternoon. "This government hasn't done anything better than the previous one." Skip to next paragraph The Reach of War Go to Complete Coverage » While some officials in Washington say Mr. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice still insist in staff meetings that Mr. Maliki must be given more time and support, there is a growing sense that he is not about to change his operating style. A former senior official said the big test would be whether Mr. Maliki could confront Mr. Sadr. "If you don't do that, I don't know how he can succeed," the official said. The prime minister's aides declined repeated requests for an interview with Mr. Maliki, who emerged as a compromise choice for prime minister during a power struggle last spring in which the White House and Mr. Sadr backed different candidates. Supporters of Mr. Maliki say it is too soon to judge his tenure. Any unity government requires compromises, they argue. "He's been in office only a short time, and the size and number of problems from the former regime and former cabinets are huge," said Sheik Khalid al-Attiya, a deputy speaker of Parliament. Mr. Maliki has made efforts to quell the Sunni-led insurgency, including reaching out to some Sunni Arab guerrilla groups, Iraqi officials say. That may help widen a rift in the insurgency between Iraqi nationalists and foreign fighters. Sheiks in rebellious Anbar Province announced last Sunday that 25 of 31 tribes in the province were ready to fight against Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. Iraqi and American officials who have dealt with Mr. Maliki say he is much more blunt and expressive in meetings than his predecessor as prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, who leads Mr. Maliki's political party. Mr. Maliki is not given to diplomatic formalities and makes his views known, they say. At the same time, he likes to listen to a range of opinion often at the expense of making decisions, the officials say. Mr. Maliki acts as if he is backed into a corner these days, said a moderate legislator who recently spent two and a half hours in a private meeting with him. "You were one of the hawks," the legislator recalled telling Mr. Maliki. "Now you're one of the doves." "No, I'm still one of the hawks," the legislator quoted the prime minister as saying. "I just need time." Mr. Maliki's security plan for Baghdad, now the American military's main effort of the war, intentionally avoids direct confrontation with Mr. Sadr's militia, despite Iraqi Army generals' apparent willingness to attack the militia and despite growing violence by rogue militia elements. The plan, begun last month after an initial failed effort in June, involves military sweeps of violent neighborhoods, generally after fighters have already fled. The murder rate has dropped in some neighborhoods. But the plan's effectiveness was called into question last week, when more than 165 bodies were found across Baghdad in four days. Shiite militiamen are the main suspects. The Baghdad morgue has said more than 1,500 civilians were killed in August, a 17 percent drop from July but higher than nearly all other months of the war. Brig. Gen. Dana J. H. Pittard, assigned to help train Iraqi police and army units, said Iraqi Army commanders, who usually have fewer sectarian loyalties than the police, were ready to take on the militias but had not gotten approval from the government. "There's this obvious question that the army guys are asking, about 'When are we going to get rid of the militias?' " General Pittard said in an interview while meeting with American military advisers at a base in Taji. "If you talk to the leaders of the Iraqi Army, they'll say, 'We need to be given an order to disarm the militias.' " Last month, after American and Iraqi soldiers attacked a militia safe house in the Sadr City neighborhood of Baghdad, the prime minister denounced the action and promised compensation to families of Iraqis killed or wounded in the assault. Lt. Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, the second-ranking commander in Iraq, said American and Iraqi generals were waiting for Mr. Maliki to find a political solution to the militias. "How long will that process take?" he said. "I don't know." Mr. Maliki has little obvious leverage over Mr. Sadr, who controls at least 30 seats in Parliament and six ministries, making him one of the most powerful figures in the government. Mr. Sadr has no intention of disbanding the Mahdi Army, because it is now part of the government, said Bahaa al-Aaraji, a senior legislator allied with him. "They are just volunteers defending their country," Mr. Aaraji said. Mr. Maliki is also tiptoeing around other powerful Shiite leaders with militias. Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the head of the Parliament's Shiite bloc, has ignited a political firestorm by calling for the legislature to approve a mechanism to create autonomous regions. Many are opposed, and the move threatens to splinter the government. But rather than rein Mr. Hakim in, Mr. Maliki has kept quiet. As a centerpiece of his reconciliation project to end the Sunni insurgency, Mr. Maliki wants to forge an amnesty policy that would draw into politics some militant Sunni Arabs and former officials from Saddam Hussein's Baath Party, Iraqi politicians say. But the proposal has been attacked by hard-line Shiites like Mr. Hakim, who is opposed to leniency for killers of Iraqis, and American politicians outraged at the idea of amnesty for those who have attacked American troops. That could doom Mr. Maliki's plan, said Ayad Jamaladin, a moderate Shiite legislator on the government's reconciliation committee. "Innocent people don't need amnesty," he said. "Guilty people need amnesty." Some conservative Sunni leaders are also resisting Mr. Maliki's efforts. Politicians in Baghdad and tribal sheiks in restive areas insist that he meet a long list of demands that includes releasing all detainees and setting a timetable for the withdrawal of American troops. Many Sunnis also fear that Mr. Maliki is beholden to Iran, and his trip there last week further stirred concerns. "With whom should we reconcile?" asked Sheik Muhammad Saleh al-Bajari, a spokesman for tribes in Falluja, the Sunni Arab stronghold. "With those who brought the occupier and killed and destroyed the future of this country?"

The New York Times-Blockade

Blockade of Lebanon Will Continue
Published: August 31, 2006

Readers' Opinions

Forum: The Middle East

Hostilities in the Mideast

Go to Complete Coverage »

Mr. Annan told Mr. Olmert in a breakfast meeting at the prime minister's residence in Jerusalem that while he would prefer that Israel completely lift its blockade of air, sea and land traffic into Lebanon, he wanted Mr. Olmert at least to allow Beirut's airport to resume normal operations.

But Mr. Olmert rejected that idea. In doing so, he referred to Mr. Annan's previous insistence that all parties to the United Nations-brokered cease-fire on Aug. 14 abide by all of its provisions.

Speaking at a joint news conference, Mr. Olmert recycled for his own purposes the same metaphor Mr. Annan had used moments before to say the cease-fire resolution was not a smorgasbord.

"As far as we are concerned," Mr. Olmert said, "we entirely accept that it is a fixed menu and that everything will be implemented, including the lifting of the blockade, as part of the entire implementation."

Therefore, he said, Israel cannot lift the blockade, imposed to prevent the smuggling of arms to Hezbollah, on one part of Lebanon and not on others.

Mr. Annan argued that reopening the airport carried particular importance "not only because of the economic effect it is having on the country, but it is also important to strengthen the democratic government of Lebanon, with which Israel has repeatedly said it has no problems."

On arrival in Amman on Wednesday night, Mr. Annan said through a spokesman that he was not discouraged by Mr. Olmert's rebuff. "The secretary general remains optimistic that the Israeli authorities will reconsider his appeal for the lifting of at least the airport blockade as a first step," said the spokesman, Ahmad Fawzi.

Mr. Olmert's domestic popularity has suffered from widespread dissatisfaction with his handling of the war, which failed to achieve the broad goal he set at its outset: dismantling or at least disarming Hezbollah.

Mr. Olmert reiterated his call for the United Nations force to be posted not just in southern Lebanon but also along the border with Syria, a deployment that the United Nations resolution makes dependent on a request from the Lebanese government.

Fouad Siniora, the Lebanese prime minister, said Monday that he had stationed 8,600 soldiers along the Syrian border, but that he would not authorize foreign troops there.

Mr. Olmert also rejected a request by Mr. Annan that Israeli troops withdraw completely from southern Lebanon once the United Nations force there reaches 5,000, rather than waiting for its full planned strength of 15,000.

"Israel will pull out of Lebanon once the resolution is implemented," Mr. Olmert said.

From Jerusalem, Mr. Annan went to Ramallah on the West Bank, where he met with Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president. Mr. Annan noted that the continuing conflict in the Palestinian areas had been overshadowed by the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Mr. Annan's stop in Israel and the West Bank was part of a Middle East trip that began with a two-day visit to Lebanon and continues with a meeting here on Thursday with King Abdullah II and includes talks in Damascus with President Bashar al-Assad and in Tehran with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called for the destruction of Israel.

An Israeli questioner at the news conference at Mr. Olmert's residence challenged Mr. Annan on why he was meeting with a man who had proposed the elimination of another United Nations member state.

"As secretary general of the United Nations, I have no other means of influencing people except through dialogue, through persuasion and through honest discussion," Mr. Annan said. "And if I am not allowed to see them and talk to them, how do I do this? How do I explain that Israel is a state that is a member state of the U.N. and that there should not be any incitement against Israel?"

Mr. Annan said he had told Mr. Olmert that his talks with Lebanese leaders had convinced him that they were serious about enforcing an embargo on illegal arms to Hezbollah and dedicated to seeking a lasting peace.

Mr. Olmert said: "I would like to emphasize that Israel has no conflict with the people or the government of Lebanon. I would hope that conditions would change rapidly in order to allow direct contact between the government of Israel and the government of Lebanon in order to hopefully soon reach an agreement between the two countries."

But Mr. Siniora dashed that idea in a news conference in Beirut.

"Lebanon will be the last Arab country that could sign a peace agreement with Israel," he said. "There will be no agreement with Israel before there is a global peace deal that is just and lasting."

The New York Times - Violence Grows

Violence Grows, Killing 52 Iraqis, in Face of Security Plan

Published: August 31, 2006

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Aug. 30 Shootings and hidden bombs at a market, a gas station and an army recruiting center killed at least 52 Iraqis on Wednesday, continuing a wave of sectarian violence that has defied stepped-up efforts to halt its spread.

Namir Noor-Eldeen/Reuters

Iraqis surveyed damage Wednesday after a bomb killed 24 people in Baghdad's Shorja market; at least 52 people died across the country.

Hostilities in the Mideast

Go to Complete Coverage »

Iraqis looked for their relatives Wednesday among bombing victims at the morgue in Hilla, south of Baghdad.

In the deadliest attack, a bomb inside a vendor's cart exploded just after 10 a.m. in the Shorja market, Baghdad's oldest and largest bazaar, killing at least 24 civilians and wounding 35, Interior Ministry officials said.

Earlier, just south of the capital, in Hilla, a bicycle rigged with explosives blew up near an army recruiting center, killing at least 12 people, the authorities said. A car bomb near a gas station in Baghdad also killed two civilians and wounded 21 people, including five policemen, who had rushed to the scene in response to a blast a few minutes earlier.

Gunmen in Baghdad killed a senior Justice Ministry official, Nadiya Muhammad Hasan, her driver and a guard. The motive was unclear, but senior officials have frequently been targets of killings in recent months.

The authorities also found 13 other bodies in various locations in the city. With at least 11 additional civilians killed throughout the country, the tally of Iraqis killed or found dead on Wednesday reached 65, according to Iraqi officials.

The rash of attacks reflecting a spike in violence that has claimed roughly 200 lives since Sunday came despite a new security plan for the capital, on a day when the top United States general, George W. Casey Jr., in Iraq said Iraqi forces could take over security as early as next year.

"I don't have a date," General Casey said in Baghdad. "But I can see over the next 12 to 18 months I can see the Iraqi security forces progressing to a point where they can take on the security responsibilities for the country, with very little coalition support."

Three years into the war, American and Iraqi officials have grown increasingly eager to show progress. In recent weeks, they have repeatedly trumpeted evidence of a decline in killings this month after increases in June and July.

Yet the bloodshed of the past few days suggests that the gains might be temporary.

Americans have not been spared. The United States military said Wednesday that a marine from the First Armored Division was killed in action on Tuesday in Anbar Province.

Military officials also said two American soldiers were killed in an attack on a Stryker vehicle on Sunday in western Baghdad, not four as it had reported earlier. The total number of American service members killed that day remained at nine, though.

This month, 60 American service members have been killed in Iraq, up from 43 in July and nearly even with the 61 killed in June, according to Coalition Casualty Count, a Web site that tracks military fatalities. In all, more than 2,600 American men and women in uniform have been killed in Iraq since the start of the war, according to the Department of Defense.

The toll for Iraqis is far higher, with an average of more than 100 killed a day in June and July by spreading sectarian violence, according to Iraqi government figures.

Statistics for August have not been released, but the attack at the Shorja market was just the latest attack in a crowded area that seemed aimed at killing as many civilians as possible.

The explosion destroyed scores of makeshift stalls, sent smoke towering over buildings and spread body parts through the streets.

Ali Jasim, 47, a yogurt vendor at the market, said that he narrowly missed being killed and that two brothers of a restaurant owner and four cardamom vendors were among those killed. "One of the women's sons was getting married tomorrow," he said.

A few hours after the explosion, piles of debris had been swept to the curb. A funeral procession flowed through the street, carrying one of the victims of the bombing.

Some of the mourners and bystanders blamed the United States, echoing a belief among some groups of Iraqis that the American government initiates the violence to justify its occupation. Others, like Raheem Kadem, 44, a high school gym teacher from Sadr City, a Shiite neighborhood, blamed Iraqi officials.

"Where is government?" he asked. "Why have the politicians left the people to face their destiny while the government hides behind the walls of the heavily protected Green Zone?"

"Things are getting worse," he said.

Iraq's defense minister, Abdul Qader Mohammed Jassim, met with the governor of Diwaniya and other local leaders in an effort to shore up support for the government after his troops clashed for 14 hours on Monday with Shiite militias.

He announced that there would be a ban on weapons, though he offered no plan for enforcing it, and said that when rival Shiite factions had disputes with forces in the area, they should ask him to intervene.

The battle was one of the worst internal conflicts in recent memory, pitting Iraqi troops against members of the Mahdi Army, loyal to the Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr, and other militias.

The Iraqi police and army officials said Wednesday that the death toll from that battle had increased, to 23 soldiers and 13 civilians.

General Casey said Iraqi forces "gave much better than they got," but his assessment could not be verified. He said the clash was not a setback for the army and the government did not intend to back down.

"The battle may be over," he said. "But the campaign to clean that city up and to restore it to Iraqi government control isn't finished."

Khalid al-Ansary and Qais Mizher contributed reporting for this article.

Τhe New York Times

Editorial Teachers Matter Published: July 4, 2006 The No Child Left Behind education act, passed by Congress four years ago, was intended to correct the corrosive inequality that has plagued public education from the start. It was with that goal in mind that Congress specified for the first time that in return for federal education dollars, states would have to end the destructive practice of staffing schools serving poor and minority children with disproportionate numbers of inexperienced and unqualified teachers. The U.S. Department of Education soft-pedaled the teacher quality requirement in the early years, probably because of pressure from the states. But as of this month, states and districts that wish to keep receiving federal school aid must file plans with the Department of Education explaining how they intend to reach the teacher quality goal. Meanwhile, the importance of that goal was just underscored by a nonpartisan Washington think tank, the Education Trust, in a study on the effects of teacher training and experience on student performance. Skeptics have often expressed doubt that good teachers would make any difference in the lives of the country's poorest students, who typically show up in first grade not at all prepared to learn. The Education Trust study, which draws on a treasure-trove of data from several states, clearly refutes this notion. The most important data set comes from Illinois, where researchers scrutinized the work and qualifications of 140,000 teachers, all of whom were assigned quality ratings based on several indicators, including where they attended college and how much experience they had. The Illinois study found teacher quality mattered a great deal in high-poverty high schools, where students with highly rated teachers were about twice as likely to meet state standards as similarly situated students elsewhere. Teacher quality even trumped course content, and it did not take paragons of achievement to make the difference. For example, students who took Algebra II at schools with average teacher quality ratings turned out to be better prepared for college than students who had completed calculus at schools with low teacher ratings. Taken together, the multistate data cited in the study show that teacher experience makes a profound difference in student performance, as do teacher literacy levels. The facts are especially clear when it comes to the crucial areas of math and science, where teachers who have majored in the subject areas generate better student performance than those who majored in outside areas. To improve student performance, the states need to play a much stronger role in teacher training and certification - and in making sure that qualified teachers are evenly spread across their school districts. Breaking with the bad old status quo won't be easy. But it's the only way for the country to improve the educational picture for the poor and minority students who will make up such a large part of the work force of the future.

To φιάσκο των ΤΕΙ (ΤΟ ΒΗΜΑ)

* H εφετινή βαθμολογική βάση του «10» ανέδειξε με τον πιο τραγικό τρόπο το πρόβλημα Καταρρέουν διά της... συγχωνεύσεως Τα επόμενα χρόνια θα κλείνουν το ένα μετά το άλλο εβδομήντα ιδρύματα της τριτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης MAPNY ΠΑΠΑΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΥ Πολιτικά «ρουσφέτια» και τοπικές διευκολύνσεις βρίσκονται πίσω από την ίδρυση πανεπιστημίων και τεχνολογικών ιδρυμάτων σε κάθε νομό της χώρας και όχι εκπαιδευτικές ανάγκες. Το «φιάσκο των TEI» αναδεικνύει με τραγικό τρόπο η εφετινή βαθμολογική βάση τού «10», αλλά και το απαρχαιωμένο πλέον σύστημα των πανελληνίων εξετάσεων για την εισαγωγή στην τριτοβάθμια εκπαίδευση της χώρας. Διά της... συγχωνεύσεως θα κλείνουν τα επόμενα χρόνια το ένα μετά το άλλο εβδομήντα ιδρύματα της τριτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης που δέχονταν φοιτητές με βαθμολογίες κάτω των 9.000 μορίων. Πρόκειται βέβαια για πρόσφατα ανωτατοποιημένα ιδρύματα, πολλά από αυτά είχαν ιδρυθεί στις εκλογικές περιφέρειες από τις οποίες κατάγονταν οι εκάστοτε υπουργοί και υφυπουργοί Παιδείας. Τα ιδρύματα αυτά αποτελούσαν τον κύριο μοχλό ανάπτυξης της τοπικής κοινωνίας, την ίδια στιγμή που οι πανεπιστημιακοί καθηγητές διαδήλωναν κοινότοπα στους δρόμους της Αθήνας «να μην περάσουν τα πανεπιστήμια-επιχειρήσεις»... Το πρόβλημα όμως είναι η κατάργηση τμημάτων για τα οποία ευθύς εξαρχής δεν υπήρχε εκπαιδευτική ανάγκη ή η βαθιά ριζωμένη ανάγκη των ελληνικών οικογενειών να δουν τα τέκνα τους σε ένα πανεπιστήμιο μέσω μάλιστα ενός εξεταστικού συστήματος που καταγγέλλεται από τους εκπαιδευτικούς ως αποτυχημένο; Τμήμα TEI Θερμοκηπιακών Καλλιεργειών και Ανθοκομίας, Λαϊκής Παραδοσιακής Μουσικής Ηπείρου, Υδάτινων Πόρων, Ανακαίνισης και Αποκατάστασης Κτιρίων, Ιχθυοκομίας και Αλιείας... Επιστημονικά αντικείμενα που, κατά πολλούς, θα έπρεπε να αποτελούν μόνο ένα μάθημα σε προγράμματα σπουδών των TEI, «θεραπεύουν» σήμερα τα πρόσφατα ανωτατοποιημένα τεχνολογικά ιδρύματα. Πρόκειται για Τμήματα που ουσιαστικά «έριξαν» τα προηγούμενα χρόνια τις βάσεις εισαγωγής στα ιδρύματα ανώτατης εκπαίδευσης κάτω των 7.000 μορίων, ενώ δεν έτυχαν ούτε προσοχής ούτε προστασίας από την πολιτεία την επομένη των πανηγυρικών εγκαινίων τους. Δεκαπέντε Τμήματα TEI, πολλά από τα οποία διαθέτουν εφέτος περισσότερες από 250 θέσεις σε πρωτοετείς φοιτητές, δέχθηκαν πέρυσι φοιτητές μόνο με βαθμολογίες κάτω από τη βαθμολογική βάση τού «10». Πρόκειται για τα Τμήματα Φυτικής Παραγωγής Δυτικής Μακεδονίας (Φλώρινα), Φυτικής Παραγωγής Καλαμάτας, Δασοπονίας Καβάλας (Δράμα), Ζωικής Παραγωγής Δυτ. Μακεδονίας (Φλώρινα), Ζωικής Παραγωγής Ηπείρου (Αρτα), Θερμοκηπιακών Καλλιεργειών και Ανθοκομίας (τρία τμήματα σε Μεσολόγγι, Καλαμάτα και Κρήτη), Γεωργικών Μηχανών και Αρδεύσεων (Λάρισα), Υδάτινων Πόρων (Μεσολόγγι), Γεωτεχνολογίας και Περιβάλλοντος (Κοζάνη), Οικολογίας και Περιβάλλοντος (Ζάκυνθος), Τεχνολογίας Γεωργικών Προϊόντων (Καλαμάτα), Εμπορικού και Ποιοτικού Ελέγχου Αγροτικών Προϊόντων (Φλώρινα), Συνεταιριστικών Οργανισμών και Εκμεταλλεύσεων (Μεσολόγγι). Σοβαρό πρόβλημα επιβίωσης αντιμετωπίζουν συνολικά 122 σχολές σε πανεπιστήμια και TEI που θα «πληρώσουν» εφέτος την επιβολή του βαθμολογικού πλαφόν για την είσοδο στην τριτοβάθμια εκπαίδευση της χώρας. Τα 70 τμήματα από αυτά δέχθηκαν πέρυσι πρωτοετείς φοιτητές με βαθμολογία κάτω των 8.500 μορίων και αποτελούν «κλασική» επιλογή φοιτητών με χαμηλές βαθμολογίες που προσπαθούν να μπουν στην ανώτατη εκπαίδευση για να μετεγγραφούν στη συνέχεια - και εφόσον το δικαιούνται - σε τεχνολογικά ιδρύματα της Αθήνας, της Θεσσαλονίκης και του Πειραιά. «Μόνο στο Τμήμα Ηλεκτρολογίας του TEI Πειραιά» ήρθαν εφέτος 230 άτομα με μετεγγραφή από την επαρχία πέραν των κανονικών εισακτέων του» λέει ο ο κ. Λαζ. Βριζίδης, καθηγητής στα TEI και διευθυντής του Κέντρου Τεχνολογικής Ερευνας Πειραιά και νήσων. «Είναι λάθος το ότι, ενώ καθιερώθηκε η βάση τού "10", δεν καταργήθηκαν οι μετεγγραφές. Ο αριθμός των μετεγγραφών από την περιφέρεια στο κέντρο αυξάνεται διαρκώς». Οπως προκύπτει από την παρουσίαση των αναλυτικών βαθμών πρόσβασης στην τριτοβάθμια εκπαίδευση που παρουσίασε το υπουργείο Παιδείας, 35.000 άτομα έδωσαν εφέτος γραπτά με βαθμολογίες «κάτω από τη βάση» και μένουν εκτός τριτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης. Στα AEI και TEI της χώρας εισάγονται 54.441 άτομα από τους υποψηφίους του ενιαίου λυκείου, ενώ αναμένεται ότι θα μείνουν κενές περίπου 11.000 θέσεις μαζί με θέσεις που θα προκύψουν στα τεχνολογικά ιδρύματα από τους υποψηφίους των Τεχνικών Επαγγελματικών Εκπαιδευτηρίων οι οποίοι δεν συμπλήρωσαν τη βάση τού «10». «Πολλά Τμήματα πράγματι κακώς δημιουργήθηκαν, χωρίς προγραμματισμό και εκπαιδευτικό σχεδιασμό» λέει ο κ. Βριζίδης. «Χρειάζεται μια νέα αναδιάρθρωση της ανώτατης εκπαίδευσης με εκπαιδευτικό προσανατολισμό» καταλήγει ο κ. Βριζίδης. «Το όριο του "10" έχει καταρρακώσει ψυχολογικά χιλιάδες υποψηφίους που το υπουργείο Παιδείας ουσιαστικά σπρώχνει στην εκπαιδευτική αγκαλιά των IEK και των διαφόρων κολεγίων» δηλώνει από την πλευρά του ο σπουδαστής στο TEI Τεχνολογικών Εφαρμογών και Εργων Υποδομής Πάτρας, Ηλίας Κάντζος. «Πρέπει να αντιμετωπιστούν τα χρόνια προβλήματα που προκαλεί η υποχρηματοδότηση με τις ελλείψεις σε υλικοτεχνική υποδομή και ωρομίσθιους καθηγητές. Χρειάζεται ενίσχυση οικονομική, για να ξεπεραστεί ο μαρασμός στον οποίο έχουν περιέλθει τα TEI»» καταλήγει. «Είναι διάχυτη στην τοπική κοινωνία η αγωνία για την τύχη των Τμημάτων» λέει μιλώντας στο «Βήμα», ο Κωνσταντίνος Διαμαντής, σπουδαστής στο TEI Γεωργικής Μηχανολογίας και Υδάτινων Πόρων στο Μεσολόγγι. «Αποτελούν οικονομικό οξυγόνο για την περιοχή, γεγονός όμως που έχει οδηγήσει και σε φαινόμενα υπερεκμετάλλευσης των σπουδαστών, όταν π.χ. πληρώνουν για γκαρσονιέρες 400 ευρώ. Το δικό μας TEI είναι εγκαταλελειμμένο στην τύχη του. Πραγματοποιούμε μαθήματα ακόμη και σε προκατασκευασμένες εγκαταστάσεις, που είναι σκέτα θερμοκήπια» δηλώνει χαρακτηριστικά. Την ανησυχία μιας ολόκληρης πόλης μεταφέρει και ο Γιώργος Κρουστάλλης, που σπουδάζει στο TEI Πολιτικών και Δομικών Εργων Σερρών. «Οι Σέρρες είναι φοιτητούπολη που κινείται οικονομικά από τους φοιτητές» λέει μιλώντας στο «Βήμα». «Αν καταργηθεί ή συγχωνευθεί το Τμήμα, τότε θα παρουσιαστεί και το οικονομικό πρόβλημα σε όσους ζουν με βασική πηγή τα έξοδα των φοιτητών» καταλήγει.

Iran /Tehran's nuclear program

Cleric Vows Iran Will Never Talk With U.S. on Nuclear Program

By HELENE COOPER and JOHN O'NEIL

 Published: June 30, 2006 A senior Iranian cleric vowed today that his country would never talk with the United States over Tehran's nuclear program, as an American official underscored the need for Iran to respond next Wednesday to a package of incentives offered by major powers in exchange for a suspension of uranium enrichment. The pronouncement by the cleric, Ahmad Khatami, at Friday prayers in Tehran today marked a 180-degree shift from a month ago, when Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, wrote to President Bush calling for the opening of a dialogue. In fact, European leaders had pressed for years for the United States to join earlier rounds of talks with Iran, and when the Bush administration decided in late May to offer to join any new discussions, the move was seen as a major concession and a prime inducement for Tehran.

On Tuesday, however, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said he saw "no use" in talking with the United States. And today, Mr. Khatami went further, declaring that "with regards to our nuclear case, we have nothing to do with the U.S. and principally, our officials will have no talks with the U.S.," according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency. "Who is the U.S., that pokes its nose into Iran's nuclear affairs?" he asked. "Should anybody that has power and bullies get to be present on all scenes?" Mr. Khatami said that Iran was willing to talk with European leaders if they recognized Iran's right to pursue nuclear power. "If Europeans really intend to solve the issue, they should recognize our absolute rights," he said. "Then, one can sit down at the table to negotiate the executive methods, the international treaties as well as controls and supervision."

In Brussels today, Undersecretary of State Nicholas R. Burns rejected the idea of giving Tehran any more time, beyond a meeting scheduled for July 5 between Iranian officials and the European Union's foreign minister, Javier Solana. Diplomats from the world's eight major industrial nations declared at a meeting in Moscow on Thursday that they expected to receive a "clear and substantive" response from Iran by then. The statement from the foreign ministers of the Group of 8 countries was the first reference to an explicit deadline for Iran to respond formally. "We are disappointed in the absence of an official Iranian response to this positive proposal," their statement said. It is unclear, however, whether Iran will meet the deadline.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said that his government will not respond until late August, a position underscored by Iran's foreign minister, Manoucher Mottaki, on Thursday. After receiving Iran's response, foreign ministers from the six major powers that made the nuclear offer - five members of the Group of 8, Russia, Britain, France, Germany and the United States, plus China - will meet on July 12 somewhere in Europe, perhaps in Paris. They are to consider whether the Iranian response can lead to an agreement, and whether to seek economic sanctions against Iran, according to a senior Bush administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to interfere with the diplomatic process.

A spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry a issued a statement on Thursday echoing that of the Group of 8 and calling on Iran to respond "as soon as possible," without mentioning a date. The leaders of the Group of 8 countries - the other three are Canada, Italy and Japan - will meet in St. Petersburg, Russia, on July 15. The group's meetings are usually rather staid, ending with bland communiquιs and news conferences where all parties pretend they are one big, happy family. Thursday's session was different. Officials forgot to turn off the audio feed from the luncheon meeting, so reporters were able to hear parts of the closed discussion, including bickering between the Russian foreign minister, Sergey V.

Lavrov, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, often over arcane points in the statement. At one point, the two squabbled about Russia's desire to include wording about "urgent methods" to "provide security for diplomats" in light of the killing of five Russian Embassy staff members in Iraq. Ms. Rice balked, saying that such wording would imply that urgent measures were not already being taken to protect Iraqis and American soldiers. "You know, on a fairly daily basis we lose soldiers, and I think it would be offensive to suggest that these efforts are not being made," she said. Mr. Lavrov replied that the sentence was not intended as criticism. "I don't believe security is fine in Iraq, and I don't believe in particular that security at foreign missions is O.K.," he said. "If you feel uncomfortable about it, maybe we should make it shorter."

Eventually they agreed that the text would simply condemn the killing of the Russians and add that "this tragic event underlines the importance of improving security for all in Iraq." No sooner was that compromise reached, than Ms. Rice and Mr. Lavrov were at odds again, this time over Mr. Lavrov's proposal that the statement include something about the need for the rest of the world to be more involved in the Iraqi political process. Ms. Rice immediately took exception. "To say the international community is to be more involved in the political process seems to me rather odd, given that they have a democratic elective process," she said. "I did not suggest this,"

Mr. Lavrov replied. "What I did say was not involvement in the political process but the involvement of the international community in support of the political process." "What does that mean?" Ms. Rice asked. There was a long pause. Then, from Mr. Lavrov: "I think you understand." Ms. Rice: "No, I don't." The sparring continued after the lunch and into a news conference. "Condoleezza Rice said that she first came to the Soviet Union in 1979 and she has noticed - seen a change in the country," Mr. Lavrov piped up, in answer to an unrelated question from a journalist. "I also first visited the U.S.A. in 1979, and I have been taking note of changes, many of which we strive to discuss with our American counterparts." Ms. Rice fumed for a few minutes while the discussion went on to other matters.

The next time she was asked a question - about whether she thought Russia had resorted to energy blackmail against Europe, she detoured. "Sergey, when did you go and where did you go in the United States in 1979, that you saw so much change?" she asked. "New York," Mr. Lavrov replied. "Oh, New York," Ms. Rice repeated, smirking. "Now I understand." Since Iran received the nuclear proposal, Iranian officials have continued to say that Iran will never give up its right to pursue nuclear enrichment, but they have also described the proposal as "positive." What happens after the Iranians do respond remains unclear.

Russia and China have resisted the idea of hauling Iran before the United Nations Security Council for sanctions, a position pushed by the United States and Britain, with France and Germany somewhere in between. In order to get Moscow on board, the United States agreed to not include mention of economic sanctions in the written part of the incentives package offered to Iran.

Bush officials continue to express optimism that if Iran turns down the package, Russia will sign on to sanctions, but the Russians continue to send mixed signals. Speaking to foreign diplomats on Tuesday, President Vladimir V. Putin said, "I repeat once again that we have no intention of joining in any kinds of ultimatums that only drive the situation into a dead end and deal a blow to the U.N. Security Council's authority." At the meeting on Thursday, Russian officials pointedly put copies of the text of that speech on the table for journalists. Helene Cooper reported from Moscow for this article, and John O'Neil reported from New York.

The New York Times

G.I.'s Investigated in Slayings of 4 and Rape in Iraq

By EDWARD WONG

Published: July 1, 2006 BAGHDAD, Iraq, June 30 -

The American military is investigating accusations that soldiers raped an Iraqi woman in her home and killed her and three family members, including a child, American officials said Friday. The investigation is the fourth into suspected killings of unarmed Iraqis by American soldiers announced by the military in June. In May, it was disclosed that the military was conducting an inquiry into the deaths of 24 civilians in Haditha last November.

The alleged rape and killings took place March 12 in the vicinity of the volatile market town of Mahmudiya, an insurgent stronghold about 20 miles south of Baghdad. The killing of the family was originally reported by the military as due to "insurgent activity," American officials said. A senior police official in Mahmudiya said in a telephone interview that he received a report of the killings in March. The victims were a woman, her child, her husband and the husband's brother, he said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals, said a sheik from the family's tribe immediately reported the episode to the police.

The American investigation began June 24, one day after two soldiers "reported alleged coalition force involvement" in the deaths of the Iraqi civilians, the military said in a written statement. A preliminary inquiry conducted after that report determined that there was sufficient evidence to merit a criminal investigation, the military said. "This is going to be a by-the-numbers, by-the-book investigation," Maj. Todd Breasseale, a military spokesman, said in a telephone interview. He said Maj. Gen. J. D. Thurman, commander of the Fourth Infantry Division, which oversees the capital and areas immediately to the south, ordered an inquiry "the minute he got the news." The American officials, who spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to speak publicly about possible criminal proceedings, said the investigation involved five soldiers from the 502nd Infantry Regiment, attached to the Fourth Infantry Division.

A senior American official confirmed several details first reported by The Associated Press on Friday, including that the soldiers were accused of raping the woman, before killing her and three other family members and possibly burning her body. An Army official in Washington also confirmed that the inquiry was focused on soldiers of the 502nd Infantry Regiment, adding, "The allegation is one of rape and murder." Earlier this month, two soldiers from the same unit were abducted while guarding a traffic control point in the town of Yusufiya and killed by insurgents, and their mutilated bodies were later found along a road booby-trapped with hidden explosives.

A third soldier was killed in Yusufiya at the time of the ambush. The alleged rape and killings came to light after a soldier felt compelled to talk about it in a "counseling-type session," after the discovery of the bodies of his kidnapped colleagues, The Associated Press reported. The soldier who originally disclosed the alleged killings had heard about them but had not taken part in them, The A.P. said. One soldier has admitted his role and has been arrested; others have had their weapons taken away and are confined to their base in Mahmudiya, American officials said. The soldiers under investigation are apparently from the same platoon as the three killed in Yusufiya. Both Mahmudiya and Yusufiya are in the so-called Triangle of Death, an extremely dangerous area along the Euphrates River valley that has become a melting pot of insurgents, criminal gangs and lawless tribes.

The American military considers the region a crucial strategic approach to Baghdad, with important highways running south to the holy city of Najaf and the oil center of Basra, but has never been able to establish control in the region. This latest investigation comes at a time of increasing scrutiny over the killings of civilians by American troops in Iraq. In Haditha, marines are accused of executing as many as 24 unarmed civilians after a fellow marine was killed by a roadside bomb.

On June 1, as the political furor over Haditha was building, the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, lashed out at the American military, saying that violence against Iraqi civilians by American troops was a "regular occurrence." Major Breasseale said Friday that he did not know when results of the Haditha investigation would be made public. In June, the Army charged four American soldiers suspected of killing three detainees in Iraq and then threatening another American soldier with death if he reported the shootings. Two days later, the Marine Corps said it had charged seven marines and one Navy corpsman with murder and kidnapping in the April killing of an Iraqi man in a village on the western outskirts of Baghdad. In that episode, the assailants are accused of planting a Kalashnikov rifle and shovel by the body of the victim to frame him as an insurgent after shooting him in the face four times.

The announcement of the investigation in Mahmudiya came as the military said Friday that three soldiers had been killed in separate combat incidents. One died Thursday night in a bombing during a foot patrol south of Baghdad. Another was killed in an explosion while on patrol on Thursday night near Balad, north of the capital; that blast also wounded a soldier. The third death occurred Thursday in the northern city of Mosul, when a soldier was killed by small-arms fire. At least 60 American soldiers died in Iraq in June, a slight decline from 69 in May and 76 in April. Yet, that was almost twice as many as in March, which, at 31, had the second-lowest monthly fatality count of the war. Until the sharp spike in April, American fatalities had been dropping for five straight months.

American commanders at the time attributed the decline to a shift by insurgents to concentrating attacks on Iraqi civilians and local security forces, and to the fact that Americans were leaving their bases less often on operations and patrols. Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a spokesman for the American command, said he saw no clear reason for the rise in fatalities after March or the small drop in June. "We are not inclined to attribute the rise and fall in numbers to any particular factor," he said. "Coalition forces remain a priority target for terrorists and insurgents, even though we've also seen a steady increase in attacks on civilians and Iraqi security forces as their primary targets." Deaths of Iraqi civilians dropped in June from previous months, according to a rough estimate by the Iraq Coalition Casualty Count, an independent Web site.

At least 840 Iraqi civilians died in June, compared with an all-time high of 1,100 the previous month, according to the site, which counts deaths from news reports. The June toll was about the same as that in February, the month that hundreds of civilians were killed in sectarian bloodletting after the bombing of a sacred Shiite shrine. Three civilians were killed Friday when a bomb exploded in a minibus in Kirkuk, and an Iraqi soldier died in another bombing in the west of the city, police officials said. Gunmen killed five Iraqi soldiers at a checkpoint south of Kirkuk. At least 21 bodies were found across Iraq, many showing signs of torture. One of them was a boy in Baghdad between the ages of 4 and 6 who had been tortured and shot in the head, an Interior Ministry official said.

The Russian government offered $10 million for information leading to the killers of five Russian Embassy workers here. On Wednesday, President Vladimir V. Putin ordered Russian special services to hunt down and kill those responsible. In an Internet audio message posted Thursday night, Osama bin Laden praised Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian militant killed in an American airstrike this month. Mr. bin Laden defended the copious bloodshed engineered by Mr. Zarqawi and his group, Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, saying that Mr. Zarqawi "had clear instructions to concentrate his fighting on the occupying invaders" and "make neutral those who wished to be neutral," according to a translation by the SITE Institute, which tracks jihadist Internet postings. Mr. bin Laden vowed that the struggle would continue in Iraq and demanded that the ruler of Jordan, King Abdullah II, allow Mr. Zarqawi to be buried in his hometown of Zarqa, Jordan.

Aγριότητες κατόπιν εντολής (ΤΑ ΝΕΑ)

Kινδύνευσαν ζωές φοιτητών που βρέθηκαν ανάμεσα στα MAT και τους κουκουλοφόρους ΜΑΝΟΣ ΧΑΡΑΛΑΜΠΑΚΗΣ, ΣΤΕΛΙΟΣ ΒΡΑΔΕΛΗΣ «Βεντέτα» άνοιξε ο υπουργός Δημόσιας Τάξης Βύρων Πολύδωρας με αφορμή τις φοιτητικές κινητοποιήσεις: οι δυνάμεις των MAT χθες ξεπέρασαν κάθε όριο αγριότητας στην πορεία των φοιτητών και από θαύμα δεν υπήρξαν θύματα έξω από τη Νομική, στη οδό Σόλωνος. Νομική Σχολή. H οδός Σόλωνος είναι πνιγμένη στα δακρυγόνα, ενώ οι δυνάμεις των MAT περικυκλώνουν τους φοιτητές από τη Μασσαλίας και τη Σίνα. Πολλοί διαδηλωτές κινδύνευσαν να ποδοπατηθούν στην είσοδο της σχολής... Οι αστυνομικοί, αφού έκοψαν στα δύο την πορεία στην οδό Πανεπιστημίου, ακολούθησαν τους φοιτητές μέχρι την είσοδο της Νομικής, στις 4.30 το απόγευμα. Εκεί, την ώρα που εκατοντάδες άτομα προσπαθούσαν να μπουν στη σχολή από τη μοναδική είσοδο της οδού Σόλωνος, δυνάμεις των MAT τούς περικύκλωσαν από τη Μασσαλίας και τη Σίνα και έκαναν χρήση χημικών. Ακολούθησε χάος και πανικός. Φοιτητές κινδύνευσαν να ποδοπατηθούν στην προσπάθειά τους να μπουν στη σχολή, καθώς το συγκεκριμένο σημείο της Σόλωνος είναι πάρα πολύ στενό. Φοιτητές έτρεχαν αλλόφρονες αλλά έβρισκαν μπροστά τους... αστυνομικούς που τους χτυπούσαν με τα κλομπ... Χαρακτηριστικό είναι ότι ακόμα και μέσα στη Νομική η ατμόσφαιρα ήταν αποπνικτική, αφού τα δακρυγόνα των αστυνομικών έπεφταν «βροχή» μέσα από τα παράθυρα. Τρεις φοιτητές αντιμετώπισαν αναπνευστικά προβλήματα εξαιτίας των χημικών και μεταφέρθηκαν με ασθενοφόρα σε νοσοκομεία. Λίγο αργότερα έπιασαν... δουλειά οι ομάδες των κουκουλοφόρων: Μπανόβγαιναν στη Νομική, άναβαν φωτιές στη Σόλωνος και άρχισαν να πετούν πέτρες και μολότοφ στους αστυνομικούς. Για... προσάναμμα χρησιμοποίησαν τραπεζάκια από καφετέρια επί της Σόλωνος, ενώ ζημιές προκλήθηκαν σε αυτοκίνητα που ήταν σταθμευμένα αυτοκίνητα στην οδό Μασσαλίας. Δακρυγόνα και στην πορεία Νωρίτερα, σε «θάλαμο αερίων» είχε μετατραπεί το κέντρο της Αθήνας από τις ρίψεις δακρυγόνων. H πορεία των περίπου 7.000 διαδηλωτών ξεκίνησε από τα Προπύλαια γύρω στις 3 το απόγευμα με μπλοκ φοιτητών από πολλές περιοχές της Ελλάδας - φοιτητές είχαν έρθει από τη Θεσσαλονίκη, την Κρήτη, τα Γιάννινα, την Πάτρα και τον Βόλο. Ο ενθουσιασμός και τα πρωτότυπα συνθήματα των φοιτητών δεν έλειψαν ούτε αυτή τη φορά: «Πότε θα κατατεθεί αυτό το νομοσχέδιο;» ρωτούσε με ντουντούκα ένας φοιτητής, «ποτέ» απαντούσαν με μια φωνή οι υπόλοιποι φοιτητές. Όσο για τη συνέχεια των κινητοποιήσεων, σειρά έχει - όπως έλεγαν - η σημερινή συγκέντρωση στο Λαγονήσι και έπειτα από μια μικρή ανάπαυλα, «ραντεβού τον Σεπτέμβρη, για να μην περάσει ο νόμος - πλαίσιο. Θα είμαστε στον δρόμο μέχρι η υπουργός να πάρει πίσω το νομοσχέδιο και να παραιτηθεί». Στο ύψος της Πλατείας Συντάγματος μικρή ομάδα από τους συγκεντρωμένους προχώρησε προς την οδό Μητροπόλεως, η οποία όμως ήταν αποκλεισμένη από κλούβες των MAT. Τότε τα υπόλοιπα μπλοκ των φοιτητικών συλλόγων αποφάσισαν να στρίψουν από την οδό Καραγεώργη Σερβίας και να κατέβουν την Πανεπιστημίου προκειμένου να αποφευχθεί σύγκρουση με την Αστυνομία. Απάντηση με χημικά Οδός αερίων. Αποπνικτική ήταν η ατμόσφαιρα για τουλάχιστον τρεις ώρες χθες το απόγευμα έξω από τη Νομική, από τη «βροχή» δακρυγόνων που έριξαν οι αστυνομικοί Ωστόσο, Αστυνομία και νεαροί κουκουλοφόροι είχαν άλλες διαθέσεις: οι δυνάμεις των MAT δεν παρακολουθούσαν απλώς την πορεία, αλλά την ακολουθούσαν παράλληλα από τη δεξιά πλευρά της Πανεπιστημίου. Περπατούσαν μάλιστα ακριβώς δίπλα στους φοιτητές. H αφορμή δεν άργησε να δοθεί: ομάδες νεαρών κουκουλοφόρων άρχισαν να τους βρίζουν και να πετούν πέτρες. Ο πετροπόλεμος έγινε εντονότερος στο ύψος του Οφθαλμιατρείου και τότε οι αστυνομικοί απάντησαν με χημικά. H πορεία κόπηκε στα δύο και οι διαδηλωτές έτρεξαν προς την οδό Ακαδημίας και την οδό Ασκληπιού, ενώ οι αστυνομικοί τους ακολουθούσαν. Λίγη ώρα αργότερα, επήλθε το... χάος στη Σόλωνος. Κουκουλοφόρος με πιστόλι ME ΟΠΛΟ ρίψης φωτοβολίδων πυροβόλησε εναντίον των αστυνομικών δυνάμεων κουκουλοφόρος που εκινείτο με το μπλοκ των φοιτητών στην οδό Σόλωνος, όπως εκτιμούν αστυνομικοί που βρίσκονταν στην περιοχή. Αξίζει να σημειωθεί πως είναι η δεύτερη συνεχόμενη περίπτωση που «γνωστός - άγνωστος» πυροβολεί εναντίον αστυνομικών δυνάμεων - η πρώτη ήταν στη συγκέντρωση της προηγούμενης Πέμπτης, έξω από την κεντρική πόρτα του Πολυτεχνείου. Σύμφωνα με πληροφορίες της ΕΛ.ΑΣ. πρόκειται για το ίδιο άτομο, το οποίο δεν διστάζει να πυροβολήσει εναντίον ανθρώπων, γνωρίζοντας πως πυροβολισμός με τέτοιου είδους όπλο μπορεί να αποβεί θανάσιμος. Καταδίκασαν τα κόμματα THN ΕΠΙΘΕΣΗ της Αστυνομίας καταδίκασαν για ακόμη μια φορά τα κόμματα. Ο εκπρόσωπος Τύπου του ΠΑΣΟΚ κ. Νίκος Αθανασάκης δήλωσε ότι οι αστυνομικές δυνάμεις και πάλι «δεν κατάφεραν να ελέγξουν τους γνωστούς - άγνωστους και έκαναν μαζική χρήση δακρυγόνων εναντίον δικαίων και αδίκων». Ο Συνασπισμός ανέφερε ότι η επίθεση της Αστυνομίας στη διαδήλωση ήταν αναίτια και προκλητική για άλλη μια φορά. Τα μέτρα «αστυνομοκρατίας και αυταρχισμού στα οποία καταφεύγει η κυβέρνηση της N.Δ. για να αντιμετωπίσει τις κινητοποιήσεις των φοιτητών» καταγγέλλει με χθεσινή ανακοίνωσή του το γραφείο Τύπου του KKE. Και «γκάφα» της ΕΛ.ΑΣ. με τα λεωφορεία της KNE ΕΠΕΙΣΟΔΙΑ ΣΗΜΕΙΩΘΗΚΑΝ χθες το μεσημέρι και έξω από το ξενοδοχείο στο Λαγονήσι, όπου πραγματοποιείται η Σύνοδος των υπουργών Παιδείας του ΟΟΣΑ. Περίπου 500 μέλη του ΠΑΜΕ ζήτησαν από τον επικεφαλής των αστυνομικών δυνάμεων να τους επιτρέψει να φτάσουν μέχρι την είσοδο του ξενοδοχείου όπου συνεδρίαζαν οι υπουργοί Παιδείας, με σκοπό να διαμαρτυρηθούν και να παραδώσουν ψήφισμα. H απάντηση των αστυνομικών ήταν αρνητική και οι διαδηλωτές επιχείρησαν να σπάσουν τον αστυνομικό κλοιό επιτιθέμενοι με ξύλα. Τα MAT έκαναν περιορισμένη χρήση χημικών και απώθησαν τους διαδηλωτές χωρίς να υπάρξει συνέχεια στο επεισόδιο. H κόντρα μεταξύ Αστυνομίας και μελών του ΠΑΜΕ και της KNE είχε αρχίσει από το πρωί, όταν η Τροχαία λίγο πριν από τη Μαλακάσα σταμάτησε 10 λεωφορεία που μετέφεραν μέλη της KNE που είχαν ξεκινήσει από τη Θεσσαλονίκη για να συμμετάσχουν στις χθεσινές και σημερινές κινητοποιήσεις. Σύμφωνα με πληροφορίες, η Αστυνομία είχε πληροφορίες πως σε ορισμένα από τα λεωφορεία που κατευθύνονταν προς την Αθήνα υπήρχαν και άτομα που μετέφεραν βόμβες μολότοφ, καδρόνια και άλλο υλικό, για να τα χρησιμοποιήσουν σε επεισόδια. Μόνο που η πληροφορία αφορούσε τα λεωφορεία που μετέφεραν μέλη άλλης κομματικής νεολαίας και όχι της KNE. Όταν η Αστυνομία αντελήφθη την «γκάφα» της ζήτησε να συνοδεύσει τα λεωφορεία της KNE μέχρι την Πλατεία Καραϊσκάκη με την αιτιολογία ότι υπήρχε πρόβλημα παρκαρίσματος για τα λεωφορεία, το οποίο θα επέλυε η ΕΛ.ΑΣ.! H Ελληνική Αστυνομία όμως πιάστηκε αδιάβαστη για μια ακόμη φορά καθώς παρασύρθηκε ουσιαστικά από τους διαδηλωτές στη Νομική. Όπως εκτιμούν αξιωματικοί της ΕΛ.ΑΣ., οι αστυνομικοί περίμεναν η πορεία να κατευθυνθεί προς το Πολυτεχνείο, κάτι που δεν συνέβη, με αποτέλεσμα διαδηλωτές (οι περισσότεροι εκ των οποίων ανήκαν στον αντιεξουσιαστικό χώρο) και αστυνομικοί να βρεθούν σε απόσταση «αναπνοής» και να αρχίσουν τα επεισόδια. «Δυστυχώς δεν καταφέραμε να περιορίσουμε τα δακρυγόνα, διότι η κατάσταση που διαμορφώθηκε δεν άφησε περιθώριο ψύχραιμης σκέψης», εκτιμούν στελέχη του υπουργείου. ΤΑ ΝΕΑ , 28/06/2006 , Σελ.: N11 Κωδικός άρθρου: A18573N111 ID: 524857

Σφαγή των Aθηνών (ΤΑ ΝΕΑ)

Aλληλομαχαιρώματα υπουργών με στόχο τη μάχη του σταυρού ΓΙΑΝΝΗΣ Λ. ΠΟΛΙΤΗΣ Το... πάπλωμα της A' περιφέρειας Αθηνών βρίσκεται - όπως πιστεύουν κυβερνητικά στελέχη - πίσω από τους καβγάδες και τις κόντρες των κορυφαίων υπουργών που έχουν ξεσπάσει την τελευταία περίοδο στην κυβέρνηση. H A' Αθηνών για τους υποψήφιους βουλευτές της N.Δ. θα είναι πιο δύσκολη από κάθε άλλη εκλογική αναμέτρηση, καθώς υπάρχουν νέοι αστάθμητοι παράγοντες. H Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη επιστρέφει με άλλον αέρα στο κυνήγι του σταυρού, ενώ ο Δημήτρης Αβραμόπουλος θα επιδιώξει σε κάθε περίπτωση να βρεθεί στις πρώτες θέσεις. Δύσκολη μάχη έχουν να δώσουν ο Προκόπης Παυλόπουλος, ο Γιώργος Αλογοσκούφης και η Μαριέττα Γιαννάκου, τρεις υπουργοί που έχουν χειριστεί μέχρι σήμερα τα πιο δύσκολα και κρίσιμα θέματα της κυβερνητικής ατζέντας. Δύσκολη μάχη έχει να δώσει ο Γιώργος Βουλγαράκης λόγω της μεγάλης φθοράς που έχει υποστεί εξαιτίας των υποκλοπών και των Πακιστανών, ενώ κομματικά στελέχη δεν αποκλείουν στην A' Αθηνών να προστεθεί ένας ακόμη αστάθμητος παράγων: ο υπουργός Επικρατείας Θόδωρος Ρουσόπουλος, που δεν έχει ακόμα ανακοινώσει σε πια περιφέρεια θα πολιτευθεί τελικά. Οι διαρροές και εκτιμήσεις από Ρηγίλλης και Μαξίμου για το ενδεχόμενο να διεξαχθούν πρόωρες εκλογές ακόμη και την άνοιξη του 2007 έφεραν τους υπουργούς Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη, Προκόπη Παυλόπουλο, Γιώργο Αλογοσκούφη, Δημήτρη Αβραμόπουλο και Γιώργο Βουλγαράκη σε θέση μάχης. Οι διαγκωνισμοί και τα μαχαιρώματα δίνουν και παίρνουν καθώς όλοι θέλουν να πλασαριστούν στις δημοσκοπήσεις στην ασφαλή θέση της πρώτης τριάδας. «Μπήκαμε νωρίς στην προεκλογική μάχη και σύντομα οι καβγάδες θα είναι καθημερινοί», υποστηρίζει κορυφαίο κυβερνητικό στέλεχος το οποίο εκτιμά ότι «τα επώνυμα στελέχη κυρίως της A' αλλά και της B' περιφέρειας Αθηνών θα ανακαλύπτουν κάθε τρεις και λίγο θέματα για να διαφωνήσουν με στόχο να τονώσουν το φιλολαϊκό προφίλ και να γίνουν αρεστοί στη βάση του κόμματος». Στην A' περιφέρεια στις προσεχείς εκλογές τα πράγματα θα είναι πιο δύσκολα από κάθε άλλη φορά καθώς υπάρχουν νέοι αστάθμητοι παράγοντες. H Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη ύστερα από μια τετραετία αποχής επιστρέφει στο κυνήγι του σταυρού με τον αέρα του πιο δημοφιλούς στελέχους της παράταξης. Την ίδια ώρα ο Νικήτας Κακλαμάνης βγαίνει από το παιχνίδι των βουλευτικών εκλογών, ενώ ο Δημήτρης Αβραμόπουλος θα επιδιώξει σε κάθε περίπτωση να βρεθεί στις πρώτες θέσεις. Δύσκολη μάχη έχουν να δώσουν ο Π. Παυλόπουλος, ο Γ. Αλογοσκούφης και η M. Γιαννάκου, τρεις υπουργοί που έχουν χειριστεί μέχρι σήμερα τα πιο δύσκολα και κρίσιμα θέματα της κυβερνητικής ατζέντας και στο διάστημα που απομένει πρέπει να κερδίσουν το χαμένο έδαφος και να βρεθούν σε καλή εκλόγιμη θέση. Κόντρες και προσλήψεις Το θέμα που άνοιξε ο υπουργός Υγείας για τις προσλήψεις νοσηλευτικού προσωπικού απο διακομματική επιτροπή, η αντίδραση του κ. Π. Παυλόπουλου που μιλάει για διορισμούς μόνο μέσω ΑΣΕΠ, όπως ορίζει το Σύνταγμα, και η αμήχανη αντίδραση του κυβερνητικού εκπροσώπου είναι ενδεικτικό παράδειγμα αυτού του κλίματος. Ο εκπρόσωπος του ΠΑΣΟΚ κ. N. Αθανασάκης κάλεσε τον κ. Αβραμόπουλο να αφήσει τα «επικοινωνιακά τεχνάσματα» και οι προσλήψεις να προχωρήσουν το ταχύτερο με νόμιμες διαδικασίες μέσω ΑΣΕΠ. Αλλά και η τακτική Αλογοσκούφη, ο οποίος επιδιώκει να καθιερωθεί ως το πιο ισχυρό πρόσωπο της κυβέρνησης που δεν διστάζει να διαφωνήσει με τον Γιώργο Σουφλιά και τον M. Λιάπη, είναι αποκαλυπτική του τρόπου που θα κινηθεί προεκλογικά. Πιο δύσκολη μάχη έχει να δώσει ο κ. Γ. Βουλγαράκης λόγω της μεγάλης φθοράς που έχει υποστεί εξαιτίας του θέματος των υποκλοπών και της απαγωγής των Πακιστανών. Κομματικά στελέχη δεν αποκλείουν στην A' Αθηνών να προστεθεί ένας ακόμη αστάθμητος παράγων. Ο υπουργός Επικρατείας Θ. Ρουσόπουλος ο οποίος διαθέτει υψηλή δημοτικότητα και μεγάλη προβολή ακόμη δεν έχει ανακοινώσει σε πια περιφέρεια θα πολιτευθεί και δεν αποκλείεται να βρεθεί κι αυτός στην A' Αθηνών. Διαφορετικό κλίμα στη B΄ Και στη B' Αθηνών το κλίμα είναι προεκλογικό με τους Βαγγέλη Μεϊμαράκη, Μιχάλη Λιάπη, Λευτέρη Ζαγορίτη, Άρη Σπηλιωτόπουλο και Κυριάκο Μητσοτάκη να τρέχουν στην κούρσα για την πρωτιά. Σε κάθε περίπτωση ωστόσο λόγω των πολλών εκλόγιμων θέσεων που έχει αυτή η περιφέρεια το κλίμα είναι διαφορετικό. Στρώνει χαλί για εκλογές Ο ΚΩΣΤΑΣ Καραμανλής - ενώ τα κορυφαία πολιτικά στελέχη στην κυβέρνησή του έχουν βγει νωρίς νωρίς στο κυνήγι του σταυρού - με τακτικές κινήσεις στρώνει το χαλί πρώτα για τις δημοτικές και μετά για τις πρόωρες βουλευτές εκλογές. Για τις δημοτικές εκλογές ο Πρωθυπουργός δημιουργεί τις προϋποθέσεις για ένα θερμό πολιτικό καλοκαίρι. Ο αντιπρόεδρος της Βουλής κ. Γ. Τραγάκης επιβεβαίωσε χθες δημοσίευμα των «ΝΕΩΝ» ότι θα παραταθεί η Ολομέλεια της Βουλής τη θερινή περίοδο με το επιχείρημα ότι το Σώμα βρίσκεται εν αναμονή του ανοίγματος των λογαριασμών από τη Γενεύη για τα εξοπλιστικά προγράμματα «TOR». Είναι προφανές ότι η κυβέρνηση επιθυμεί νέο κύκλο σύγκρουσης με το ΠΑΣΟΚ για το επίμαχο αυτό ζήτημα ώστε να συσπειρώσει ξανά την κομματική βάση της N.Δ. εν όψει δημοτικών εκλογών. Για τις εθνικές εκλογές ο σχεδιασμός του Μεγάρου Μαξίμου είναι απλός: Ο κ. K. Καραμανλής και συνεργάτες του εκτιμούν ότι το πολιτικό κλίμα ευνοεί την κυβέρνηση περισσότερο από κάθε άλλη φορά για πρόωρη προσφυγή στις κάλπες. Μόνο που αυτό το κλίμα πρέπει να διατηρηθεί τουλάχιστον μέχρι την ερχόμενη άνοιξη και αυτό δεν είναι καθόλου εύκολη υπόθεση. Έτσι το σχέδιο προβλέπει ένα δίμηνο κυβερνητικών πρωτοβουλιών αμέσως μετά τις δημοτικές και στη συνέχεια να πέσουν οι τόνοι. Συγκεκριμένα οι συνεργάτες του κ. K. Καραμανλή εκτιμούν ότι ο ωφέλιμος πολιτικά χρόνος της παρούσας κυβέρνησης για δύσκολες αποφάσεις που προκαλούν εντάσεις είναι ουσιαστικά δυο μήνες: ο Νοέμβριος και ο Δεκέμβριος. «Ειδικά εάν πάει καλά η N.Δ. στις δημοτικές εκλογές οι μήνες που έπονται είναι σημαντικοί για κρίσιμες αποφάσεις», λέει κορυφαίο κυβερνητικό στέλεχος. Και οι αποφάσεις αυτές είναι δυο: η πρώτη είναι η ιδιωτικοποίηση της Ολυμπιακής και η δεύτερη το νομοσχέδιο για την Παιδεία.«Αυτά είναι δυο θέματα που πρέπει να κλείσουν σε κάθε περίπτωση και επειδή οι τελευταίες εντυπώσεις είναι αυτές που μένουν στην πολιτική αυτό που θα μείνει στην κοινή γνώμη είναι ότι η κυβέρνηση προχωρεί στις μεταρρυθμίσεις που έχει αποφασίσει και στη δεύτερη τετραετία το πρόγραμμα μεταρρυθμίσεων θα ολοκληρωθεί». ΤΑ ΝΕΑ , 28/06/2006 , Σελ.: N08 Κωδικός άρθρου: A18573N081 ID: 524867

Ριπές (ΤΑ ΝΕΑ)

PIΠEΣ Eυθύνες EINAI προβοκάτορες που θέλουν να προκαλέσουν επεισόδια για να αμαυρώσουν τις κινητοποιήσεις των φοιτητών; Είναι αναρχικοί που εκμεταλλεύονται τις διαδηλώσεις για να τα κάνουν γυαλιά καρφιά; ΟΠΟΙΑ εκδοχή και αν ισχύει, είναι φανερό πως το φοιτητικό κίνημα οφείλει με κάθε τρόπο να προστατεύσει τις κινητοποιήσεις του αν δεν θέλει να ρισκάρει την αποξένωσή του από τους πολίτες. Γιατί είναι άλλο πράγμα η μαχητικότητα και άλλο οι γενικευμένες καταστροφές εις βάρος των περιουσιών αμέτοχων επαγγελματιών. AYTA ωστόσο καθόλου δεν απαλλάσσουν την Αστυνομία από τις δικές της ευθύνες. Ιδιαίτερα χθες η συμπεριφορά της έμοιαζε να επιδιώκει τη σύγκρουση καθώς οι κινήσεις των MAT - λίγα μόλις μέτρα από τους διαδηλωτές - αλλά και η αντίδρασή τους ήταν βέβαιο ότι θα έριχναν λάδι στη φωτιά. Ο κ. Πολύδωρας, για λόγους που ο ίδιος γνωρίζει, έχει φροντίσει από την πρώτη στιγμή να δώσει έναν ηρωικό τόνο στη συμπεριφορά των MAT. Και δεν χωρά αμφιβολία ότι σε ορισμένες περιπτώσεις, όπως όταν δέχονται επιθέσεις με μολότοφ, μπαίνουν και οι ίδιοι σε κίνδυνο για να προστατεύσουν την πόλη. ΟΜΩΣ πρώτοι αυτοί οφείλουν να επιδεικνύουν αυτοσυγκράτηση. Και για να αποφύγουν τη γενίκευση των επεισοδίων, αλλά και για να προστατεύσουν σε τελευταία ανάλυση τους ίδιους τους φοιτητές - οι περισσότεροι είναι νέα παιδιά που αγωνίστηκαν για να μπουν στο πανεπιστήμιο και βρίσκονται σήμερα εγκλωβισμένοι μεταξύ των MAT και των κουκουλοφόρων. H χθεσινή εικόνα της πολιορκίας της Νομικής με τα δακρυγόνα να πέφτουν αδιακρίτως ακόμα και μέσα στο κτίριο ήταν χαρακτηριστική. Όπως και η καθυστέρηση που επέδειξαν τα MAT να αφήσουν διαδρόμους για να αποχωρήσουν οι εγκλωβισμένοι. ME τέτοιες «μεθόδους» είναι θαύμα που δεν θρηνήσαμε θύματα! ΤΑ ΝΕΑ , 28/06/2006 , Σελ.: N03 Κωδικός άρθρου: A18573N033 ID: 524956

Profile

free_dober_man Free_doberman
Attiki
Το προφίλ μου

Να ξεσκεπάζουμε τη διαπλοκή

Ημερολόγιο

Μάιος 2012
ΚΔΤΤΠΠΣ
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by pathfinder blogs